Squareroot informative, earn your knowledge!








In order to post your article please login to your account


Email:
Password:

Keep me logged in!

Forget password?

If you do not have an account, Create one here

Privacy Policy | Terms and conditions


Should we value labour by money?


By:Manish RaiDate:2018-03-20
It must be noted that when we give someone currency or cash then we actually take his work. Similarly when you take the cash back you give him your work. Since money is considered stable in ideal economy(An ideal economy is one where inflation does not occur), it should not be valued with something as unstable as product. Work or more specifically the skill is similar to knowledge, and if preserved it can be stable. And to exchange this skill you pay, this payment is in the form of promise written on bank note or currency that you will preserve this skill. This clearly means that in an ideal economy bills should only be exchanged for skills, this also means that only education should have monitory value. But what about labour then? Here comes the problem when you pay bill of promise or document of lending whatever you call it for the exchange of labour you somewhere promote slavery. This clearly means that the buyer of the labour will have to pay the seller with the labour back and take his cash, or else this will mean that the buyer will become poorer day by day. Because we know that physical work is a habit and once not practiced it becomes even more difficult to do it. This always keeps creating a fluctuating economy inclined towards one class at a time and towards the other class at some other time. Though the aim of economy is to achieve a stable ground, so that knowledge exploration can be achieved. We all will agree that we are not here in this world to play economic see- saw but we all are here actually to gain knowledge. It’s not the game which is beneficial for us but it is the knowledge. Games are meant for kids but economy is a serious matter. To solve the problems of labour we created machines, machines are also the outcome of a skill.
This clearly means that the paying for labour might be our obligation but it is not the solution, we are not meant to promote this rather we are meant to find a solution. This exchange of labour with money makes the economy more complicated and delusional, this delusion decreases the trust on a currency and the value of the currency falls. We can not judge labour or physical work by money. If we do a deep introspect we would find that physical labour of humans can never be judged by debts, it will just make everyone way more poorer. This is the reason we got rid of slavery, we revolted for it. And now what we are again moving towards economic slavery, but why?